Describe clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including examples and rationales. What did you see with the vital signs? What was seen with assessment? Current medication etc

Address Why this clinical Experience was Challenging: (use references to support this)

Clinical Judgement Process
CUE IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS *Address for each hypothesis

· Individual/Internal Factors (for Nurse)

Knowledge • Skills • Level of experience • Confidence • Specialty background • Personal characteristics • Prior experience, education, emotions, confidence, personal values, professional orientation, and experiential learning.

Environmental/ External Factors (for Client Situation):

Client observation • Physical environment • Resources • Health/medical records • Time pressure/urgency • Task complexity • Consequences and risks • Cultural considerations, distractions interruptions and professional autonomy

Internal Cues for Nurse:

External Cues for Patient

Priority Hypothesis: ? (Use reference support):

Why is this the priority? (Use reference support):

Intervention 1(also known as Solution): : What cues were significant? After you analyze your cues, what was your priority hypothesis? Describe the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.

Rationale (Use reference support):

Intervention 2: What is the next important intervention? What cues were significant? After you analyze your cues, what was your priority hypothesis? Describe the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.

Rationale: (Use reference support):

Second Hypothesis

CUE IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS *Address for each hypothesis

·

Internal Cues for Nurse:

External Cues for Patient

Second Hypothesis:

Intervention 1: What cues were significant? After you analyze your cues, what was your priority hypothesis? Describe the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.

Rationale: (Use reference support):

Intervention 2: What is the next important intervention? What cues were significant? After you analyze your cues, what was your priority hypothesis? Describe the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.

Rationale: (Use reference support):

References

See https://guides.rasmussen.edu/apa/references

Deliverable 5 – Outcomes-based Cycle of Clinical Reasoning and Clinical Judgment
· Format: Create a one-to-two-page handout

·

A

B

C

F

Criterion 1

Comprehensive summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including superior examples and rationales.

Satisfactory summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including sufficient examples and rationales.

Somewhat reasonable summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including some examples and rationales.

Partial summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including minimal examples and rationales.

Criterion 2

Detailed description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including superior rationales and evidence from credible sources.

Satisfactory description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including sufficient rationales and evidence from credible sources.

Somewhat reasonable description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including some rationales and evidence from credible sources.

Partial description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including minimal rationales and evidence from credible sources.

Criterion 3

Skillful selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including superior supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.

Satisfactory selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including sufficient supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.

Somewhat reasonable selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including some supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.

Vague of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including minimal supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.

Criterion 4

Formal style is demonstrated throughout the document, including no spelling, grammar, or APA format errors.

Formal style is demonstrated throughout most of the document, with minor spelling, grammar, or APA format errors.

Formal style is demonstrated in some parts of the document but not maintained throughout. Some spelling, grammar, or APA format errors present.

Lack of formal style in the document. Numerous spelling, grammar, or APA format errors are present.

We can handle this paper for you

We Guarantee ZERO Plagiarism ZERO AI

Done by Professional writers from scratch