Assignment: After reading Easter’s End, The Revisions in a popular Scientific Hypothesis and, The old and the new way summary please

Compare the two hypotheses- outline the similarities and differences in all ways that you noticed from observation to data collection ( a comparison table or graphic outline might be helpful here for your own benefit in organizing thoughts). The summary article may help get you started as well- but don’t leave out the details provided in the other two articles.

Explain how exploring the initial research and then the proposed revision of the hypothesis is an excellent example of how science works (think back to the eyes on cows article and how science works diagram) Gathering new data, rethinking hypothesis, communicating new ideas. And answer: Is this debate over? Is there really ever an end to the scientific process, can we ever say something is over?

Critical Thinking from “Revisions” article: Does this new doubt in the original Easter Island hypothesis of ecosystem ruin and unsustainable living mean that we should not be concerned about using resources unsustainably on our island in space we call Earth? Explain using quotes or a summary from the “What Happened on Easter Island-The Old and the New Way” article- why does Krulwich think the second hypothesis is no environmental “success story” and maybe even scarier? What do you think?

https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/easters-end

We can handle this paper for you

We Guarantee ZERO Plagiarism ZERO AI

Done by Professional writers from scratch