Sperm or no sperm, that is the question

How much effort  do you think should and analyst put in to find sperm cells to prove  sexual assault? As a jury member would you want to see that the analyst  found sperm OR would you be convinced if the analyst detected DNA, such  as a Y chromosome indicating male contribution to the stain? This is a  question that crime labs are now addressing and it's been a topic of  some discussion in the courts and courts of appeals.

Nurses vs Doctors in collections of evidence from victims

Do you think a victim of a sexual  assault should be examined by a nurse practitioner or Medical Doctors or  DO’s? This topic sometimes comes up in court, the whole system has  changed.